Delayed vagal nerve compressive neuropathy following placement of vagal nerve stimulator: case report.

Vagal neuropathy causing vocal fold palsy is an uncommon complication of vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) placement. It may be associated with intraoperative nerve injury or with device stimulation. Here we present the first case of delayed, compressive vagal neuropathy associated with VNS coil placement which presented with progressive hoarseness and vocal cord paralysis. Coil removal and vagal neurolysis was performed to relieve the compression. Larger 3 mm VNS coils were placed for continuation of therapy. Coils with a larger inner diameter should be employed where possible to prevent this complication. The frequency of VNS-associated vagal nerve compression may warrant further investigation.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on poststroke cognitive impairment: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Poststroke cognitive impairment is a common complication in stroke survivors, seriously affecting their quality of life. Therefore, it is crucial to improve cognitive function of patients who had a stroke. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) are non-invasive, safe treatments with great potential to improve cognitive function in poststroke patients. However, further improvements are needed in the effectiveness of a single non-invasive brain stimulation technique for cognitive rehabilitation. This study protocol aims to investigate the effect and neural mechanism of the combination of tDCS and taVNS on cognitive function in patients who had a stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre, prospective, parallel, randomised controlled trial, a total of 66 patients with poststroke cognitive impairment will be recruited and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to the tDCS group, the taVNS group and the combination of tDCS and taVNS group. Each group will receive 30 min of treatment daily, five times weekly for 3 weeks. Primary clinical outcome is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Secondary clinical outcomes include the Mini-Mental State Examination, Stroop Colour Word Test, Trail Marking Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Modified Barthel Index. All clinical outcomes, functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging will be measured at preintervention and postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University (approval no: KY202390). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals or at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300076632.

Online Bayesian optimization of vagus nerve stimulation.

Objective.In bioelectronic medicine, neuromodulation therapies induce neural signals to the brain or organs, modifying their function. Stimulation devices capable of triggering exogenous neural signals using electrical waveforms require a complex and multi-dimensional parameter space to control such waveforms. Determining the best combination of parameters (waveform optimization or dosing) for treating a particular patient's illness is therefore challenging. Comprehensive parameter searching for an optimal stimulation effect is often infeasible in a clinical setting due to the size of the parameter space. Restricting this space, however, may lead to suboptimal therapeutic results, reduced responder rates, and adverse effects.Approach. As an alternative to a full parameter search, we present a flexible machine learning, data acquisition, and processing framework for optimizing neural stimulation parameters, requiring as few steps as possible using Bayesian optimization. This optimization builds a model of the neural and physiological responses to stimulations, enabling it to optimize stimulation parameters and provide estimates of the accuracy of the response model. The vagus nerve (VN) innervates, among other thoracic and visceral organs, the heart, thus controlling heart rate (HR), making it an ideal candidate for demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.Main results.The efficacy of our optimization approach was first evaluated on simulated neural responses, then applied to VN stimulation intraoperatively in porcine subjects. Optimization converged quickly on parameters achieving target HRs and optimizing neural B-fiber activations despite high intersubject variability.Significance.An optimized stimulation waveform was achieved in real time with far fewer stimulations than required by alternative optimization strategies, thus minimizing exposure to side effects. Uncertainty estimates helped avoiding stimulations outside a safe range. Our approach shows that a complex set of neural stimulation parameters can be optimized in real-time for a patient to achieve a personalized precision dosing.

A framework for the interpretation of heart rate variability applied to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and osteopathic manipulation.

Reports on autonomic responses to transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) and osteopathic manipulative techniques have been equivocal, partly due to inconsistent interpretation of heart rate variability (HRV). We developed a mechanistic framework for the interpretation of HRV based on a model of sinus node automaticity that considers autonomic effects on Phase 3 repolarization and Phase 4 depolarization of the sinoatrial action potential. The model was applied to HRV parameters calculated from ECG recordings (healthy adult humans, both genders) before (30 min), during (15 min), and after (30 min) a time control intervention (rest, n = 23), taVNS (10 Hz, 300 µs, 1-2 mA, cymba concha, left ear, n = 12), or occipitoatlantal decompression (OA-D, n = 14). The experimental protocol was repeated on 3 consecutive days. The model simulation revealed that low frequency (LF) HRV best predicts sympathetic tone when calculated from heart rate time series, while high frequency (HF) HRV best predicts parasympathetic tone when calculated from heart period time series. Applying our model to the HRV responses to taVNS and OA-D, revealed that taVNS increases cardiac parasympathetic tone, while OA-D elicits a mild decrease in cardiac sympathetic tone.

Implantation Surgery for Abdominal Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Recording Studies in Awake Rats.

Abdominal vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can be applied to the subdiaphragmatic branch of the vagus nerve of rats. Due to its anatomical location, it does not have any respiratory and cardiac off-target effects commonly associated with cervical VNS. The lack of respiratory and cardiac off-target effects means that the intensity of stimulation does not need to be lowered to reduce side effects commonly experienced during cervical VNS. Few recent studies demonstrate the anti-inflammatory effects of abdominal VNS in rat models of inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and glycemia reduction in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Rat is a great model to explore the potential of this technology because of the well-established anatomy of the vagus nerve, the large size of the nerve that allows easy handling, and the availability of many disease models. Here, we describe the methods for cleaning and sterilizing the abdominal VNS electrode array and surgical protocol in rats. We also describe the technology required for confirmation of suprathreshold stimulation by recording evoked compound action potentials. Abdominal VNS has the potential to offer selective, effective treatment for a variety of conditions, including inflammatory diseases, and the application is expected to expand similarly to cervical VNS.

Vagus nerve stimulation and heart rate variability: A scoping review of a somatic oscillatory signal.

The goal of this review is to synthesize the literature on vagus nerve stimulator (VNS)-related changes in heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and assess the role of these changes in seizure relief. A scoping literature review was performed with the following inclusion criteria: primary articles written in English, involved implantable VNS in humans, and had HRV as a primary outcome. Twenty-nine studies were retrieved, however with considerable heterogeneity in study methods. The overall depression in HRV seen in DRE patients compared to healthy controls persisted even after VNS implant, indicating that achieving "healthy" HRV is not necessary for VNS therapeutic success. Within DRE patients, changes in frequency domain parameters six months after VNS implant returned to baseline after a year. The mechanism of how VNS reduces seizure burden does not appear to be significantly related to alterations in baseline HRV. However, the subtlety of sympathetic/parasympathetic signaling likely requires a more structured approach to experimental and analytic techniques than currently found in the literature.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulates the processing of interoceptive prediction error signals and their role in allostatic regulation.

It has recently been suggested that predictive processing principles may apply to interoception, defined as the processing of hormonal, autonomic, visceral, and immunological signals. In the current study, we aimed at providing empirical evidence for the role of cardiac interoceptive prediction errors signals on allostatic adjustments, using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) as a tool to modulate the processing of interoceptive afferents. In a within-subject design, participants performed a cardiac-related interoceptive task (heartbeat counting task) under taVNS and sham stimulation, spaced 1-week apart. We observed that taVNS, in contrast to sham stimulation, facilitated the maintenance of interoceptive accuracy levels over time (from the initial, stimulation-free, baseline block to subsequent stimulation blocks), suggesting that vagus nerve stimulation may have helped to maintain engagement to cardiac afferent signals. During the interoceptive task, taVNS compared to sham, produced higher heart-evoked potentials (HEP) amplitudes, a potential readout measure of cardiac-related prediction error processing. Further analyses revealed that the positive relation between interoceptive accuracy and allostatic adjustments-as measured by heart rate variability (HRV)-was mediated by HEP amplitudes. Providing initial support for predictive processing accounts of interoception, our results suggest that the stimulation of the vagus nerve may increase the precision with which interoceptive signals are processed, favoring their influence on allostatic adjustments.

Transcutaneous cervical vagus nerve stimulation improves sensory performance in humans: a randomized controlled crossover pilot study.

Accurate senses depend on high-fidelity encoding by sensory receptors and error-free processing in the brain. Progress has been made towards restoring damaged sensory receptors. However, methods for on-demand treatment of impaired central sensory processing are scarce. Prior invasive studies demonstrated that continuous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in rodents can activate the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system to rapidly improve central sensory processing. Here, we investigated whether transcutaneous VNS improves sensory performance in humans. We conducted three sham-controlled experiments, each with 12 neurotypical adults, that measured the effects of transcutaneous VNS on metrics of auditory and visual performance, and heart rate variability (HRV). Continuous stimulation was delivered to cervical (tcVNS) or auricular (taVNS) branches of the vagus nerve while participants performed psychophysics tasks or passively viewed a display. Relative to sham stimulation, tcVNS improved auditory performance by 37% (p = 0.00052) and visual performance by 23% (p = 0.038). Participants with lower performance during sham conditions experienced larger tcVNS-evoked improvements (p = 0.0040). Lastly, tcVNS increased HRV during passive viewing, corroborating vagal engagement. No evidence for an effect of taVNS was observed. These findings validate the effectiveness of tcVNS in humans and position it as a method for on-demand interventions of impairments associated with central sensory processing dysfunction.

Effectiveness of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) on salicylate-induced tinnitus.

INTRODUCTION: Tinnitus is the most common symptom of auditory system disorders. It affects the quality of life of millions of people, but it is still incurable in most cases. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is a potential new treatment for subjective tinnitus. In this study, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) combined with tones was utilized to treat salicylate-induced tinnitus since salicylate is a reliable and convenient approach for rapidly inducing tinnitus. METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into acoustic stimulation alone (AS, n = 6), tVNS alone (n = 6), and tVNS with AS (n = 6) groups for behavioral and electrophysiological tests. They were assessed by auditory brainstem response (ABR), prepulse inhibition (PPI), gap prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS), social interactions, and aggressive behavior tests at baseline and seven days' post-salicylate (175 mg/kg, twice a day) injection. RESULTS: The inhibition percentage of the GPIAS test was significantly reduced post-salicylate injection in the tVNS and AS alone groups, while it was not significant in the tVNS with AS group. There was no significant difference in the mean percentage of the GPIAS test between the tVNS groups (with or without AS) after salicylate injections. Social interactions were significantly different in the AS alone group pre- and post-salicylate injections, but they were not significant in other groups. Moreover, the results of aggressive behavior tests showed significantly increased post-salicylate injections in the AS alone group, while they were not significant in the tVNS groups (with or without AS). CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that the application of tVNS alone produced improved social interaction and mood and alleviated salicylate-induced tinnitus severity. Moreover, combining tVNS with acoustic stimulation can prevent salicylate-induced tinnitus.

Preliminary evidence of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation effects on sleep in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Sleep problems are common among veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and closely associated with hyperarousal symptoms. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) may have potential to improve sleep quality in veterans with PTSD through effects on brain systems relevant to hyperarousal and sleep-wake regulation. The current pilot study examines the effect of 1 h of tVNS administered at "lights out" on sleep architecture, microstructure, and autonomic activity. Thirteen veterans with PTSD completed two nights of laboratory-based polysomnography during which they received 1 h of either active tVNS (tragus) or sham stimulation (earlobe) at "lights out" with randomised order. Sleep staging and stability metrics were derived from polysomnography data. Autonomic activity during sleep was assessed using the Porges-Bohrer method for calculating respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSAP-B ). Paired t-tests revealed a small decrease in the total sleep time (d = -0.31), increase in N3 sleep (d = 0.23), and a small-to-moderate decrease in REM sleep (d = -0.48) on nights of active tVNS relative to sham stimulation. tVNS was also associated with a moderate reduction in cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) rate (d = -0.65) and small-to-moderate increase in RSAP-B during NREM sleep. Greater NREM RSAP-B was associated with a reduced CAP rate and NREM alpha power. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that tVNS may improve sleep depth and stability in veterans with PTSD, as well as increase parasympathetically mediated nocturnal autonomic activity. These results warrant continued investigation into tVNS as a potential tool for treating sleep disturbance in veterans with PTSD.

Analgesic Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Visceral Hypersensitivity: A Direct Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods in Rats.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate analgesic effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on visceral hypersensitivity (VH) in a rodent model of functional dyspepsia (FD) and to compare invasive VNS with noninvasive auricular VNS (aVNS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen ten-day-old male rats were gavaged with 0.1% iodoacetamide (IA) or 2% sucrose solution for six days. After eight weeks, IA-treated rats were implanted with electrodes for VNS or aVNS (n = 6 per group). Different parameters, varying in frequency and stimulation duty cycle, were tested to find the best parameter based on the improvement of VH assessed by electromyogram (EMG) during gastric distension. RESULTS: Compared with sucrose-treated rats, visceral sensitivity was increased significantly in IA-treated "FD" rats and ameliorated remarkably by VNS (at 40, 60, and 80 mm Hg; p ≤ 0.02, respectively) and aVNS (at 60 and 80 mm Hg; p ≤ 0.05, respectively) with the parameter of 100 Hz and 20% duty cycle. There was no significant difference in area under the curve of EMG responses between VNS and aVNS (at 60 and 80 mm Hg, both p > 0.05). Spectral analysis of heart rate variability revealed a significant enhancement in vagal efferent activity while applying VNS/aVNS compared with sham stimulation (p < 0.01). In the presence of atropine, no significant differences were noted in EMG after VNS/aVNS. Naloxone blocked the analgesic effects of VNS/aVNS. CONCLUSIONS: VNS/aVNS with optimized parameter elicits ameliorative effects on VH, mediated by autonomic and opioid mechanisms. aVNS is as effective as direct VNS and has great potential for treating visceral pain in patients with FD.

Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on the quality of sleep and sleep apnea in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to systematically evaluate the current evidence surrounding the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on quality of sleep and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the Embase and MEDLINE databases. Studies were included if they involved patients with drug-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS and used validated tools to report on quality of sleep or sleep apnea. The literature search yielded 112 citations related to VNS and sleep quality, and 82 citations related to sleep apnea. Twelve articles were included in the review, of which five measured quality of sleep among patients who underwent VNS, six studies measured sleep apnea, and one study measured both outcomes. RESULTS: Studies measuring quality of sleep used different methods, including sleep quality questionnaires and the percentage of sleep in each cycle. Studies also varied in patient populations, the use of control groups, and whether multiple measurements were taken for each patient. Some studies found improved sleep quality after VNS, whereas others found reductions in deep sleep stages. Additionally, mixed results in sleep quality were found when comparing patients with epilepsy who received VNS treatment versus patients with epilepsy who did not receive VNS treatment. Variables such as VNS intensity and age could potentially confound quality of sleep. Studies measuring sleep apnea consistently found increased proportions of patients diagnosed with OSA or increased sleep index scores after VNS implantation. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, the effect of VNS on quality of sleep remains unclear, as studies were very heterogeneous, although the effect on sleep apnea has consistently shown an increase in sleep apnea severity indices after VNS implantation. Future studies with consistent measures and discussions of confounding are required to determine the effect of VNS on quality of sleep, and the effect of VNS parameters should be further explored among patients who develop sleep apnea.

Longitudinal EpiTrack assessment of executive functions following vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate executive functions and attention with repeated EpiTrack evaluations in a group of DR patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) receiving vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) during a follow-up duration of up to 5 years. METHODS: The study involved 33 patients with DRE who were assessed with EpiTrack as a part of the clinical VNS protocol. Evaluations were scheduled prior to VNS implantation and then at 6 months, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. However, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted follow-up. Therefore, changes in EpiTrack total scores over time were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects (LMEs) model to compensate for the variation in follow-up duration when predicting EpiTrack total score changes over 5 years. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 29 months. During each month, the EpiTrack total score was predicted to increase by 0.07 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.12, P = 0.02), corresponding to a change from a baseline score of 27.3 (severe impairment) to a score of 28.9 (mild impairment) at 2 years and a score of 31.5 (almost normal) at 5 years. In the group of patients with psychiatric comorbidities, the EpiTrack total score increased by 0.14 units per month (P = 0.003), which was 3.5-fold higher than the increase of patients without psychiatric comorbidities. For the patients taking 1-2 antiseizure medications (ASMs), the EpiTrack total score increased by 0.11 units per month (P = 0.005), which was almost quadruple the rate of patients taking 3-4 ASMs. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on EpiTrack total scores, the LME model predicted a four-point improvement in executive functions among patients with DRE at 5 years after the initiation of VNS, representing a clinically meaningful change. DRE patients with comorbid depression seemed to experience the most cognitive benefits. In addition, better cognitive outcomes were achieved if the patient took less than three ASMs. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Executive functions and attention may improve during vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy patients who have depression or use fewer than three antiseizure medications are likely to benefit cognitively more from the treatment.

[Evaluation of the relevance of the pharmaceutical educational interview on the knowledge and satisfaction of patients who received a vagus nerve neurostimulator implantation]. / Évaluation de la pertinence de l'entretien pharmaceutique éducatif sur les connaissances et la satisfaction de patients ayant bénéficié d'une implantation d'un neurostimulateur du nerf vague.

INTRODUCTION: Vagal neurostimulation (VNS) medical devices (MDs) are used to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Using a magnet, the patient can activate on the stimulations in order to stop a seizure or interrupt the adverse effects (AEs) of the device. The objective is to evaluate the improvement of the patients' knowledge about the VNS following a pharmaceutical educational interview (PEI) as well as their satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pharmaceutical educational interview regarding drugs and DMs was performed by the clinical pharmacist at the patient's bed after VNS implantation. A questionnaire about VNS devices (operation, adverse effects, recommendations) and assessing knowledge was submitted to patients before and after the PEI. Satisfaction was assessed by the Likert scale. RESULTS: From March 2020 to August 2021, 18 implanted patients were included in the study. In 78% of cases (14/18), the total number of good responses after PEI increased. The mean good response was significantly increased from 16.11/25 (64%) before PEI to 22.33/25 (89%) after PEI (P-value<0.01). The maximum satisfaction score (4/4) was given in 71% of the items. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: The results support the relevance of PEI. Patients feel a need for information and consider the interview useful. An improvement in knowledge was observed, which allows us to hope for an optimization of the effectiveness of the device, in particular, a reduction in seizures and AE. This study shows the feasibility and the interest of the development of clinical pharmacy applied to medical devices in complementarity with the expertise on drugs.

Neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy.

The experience with neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy is far less extensive than for adults. Nevertheless, the implementation of these techniques could be of great value, especially considering the detrimental effects of ongoing seizures on the developing brain. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for neurostimulation for childhood epilepsy. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most studied neurostimulation modality in children. Based on mostly retrospective, open-label studies, we can conclude that VNS has a similar safety and efficacy profile in children compared to adults. Although there is little available evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in children, both DBS and RNS show promise in reducing seizure frequency with few complications. The implementation of non-invasive techniques with a more appealing safety profile has gained interest. Small randomized control trials and open-label studies have investigated transcranial direct current simulation for childhood epilepsy, demonstrating promising but inconsistent findings.

Neuromodulation and Functional Gastrointestinal Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common, and they severely impair an individual's quality of life. The mechanism of pathogenesis and the effective treatments for FGIDs remain elusive. Neuromodulation-a relatively new treatment-has exhibited a good therapeutic effect on FGIDs, although there are different methods for different symptoms of FGIDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used PubMed to review the history of neuromodulation for the treatment of FGIDs and to review several recently proposed neuromodulation approaches with improved effects on FGIDs. CONCLUSION: Electroacupuncture, transcutaneous electroacupuncture, transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) (which relies on vagal nerve stimulation), and gastric electrical stimulation (which works through the modulation of slow waves generated by the interstitial cells of Cajal), in addition to the noninvasive neurostimulation alternative approach method of SNS-tibial nerve stimulation and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (which is still in its infancy), are some of the proposed neuromodulation approaches with improved effects on FGIDs. This review has discussed some critical issues related to the selection of stimulation parameters and the underlying mechanism and attempts to outline future research directions backed by the existing literature.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with cognitively preserved structural focal epilepsy: A case series report.

OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) was performed in two patients suffering structural focal epilepsy with preserved intellectual ability to show the feasibility of taVNS for specific patient groups. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Patient 1 was a 24-year-old woman with frontal lobe epilepsy who had weekly hyperkinetic seizures despite multiple anti-seizure medications. Patient 2 was a 27-year-old woman with parietal lobe epilepsy and focal cortical dysplasia in the vicinity of the lipoma in the corpus callosum. She experienced weekly focal-impaired awareness seizures even with anti-seizure medication. taVNS was applied to the left earlobe of both patients at 1.5 mA, 25 Hz, 250 µs pulse width, and 30 s stimulation with 30 s rest for 4 h per day. Over an 8-week baseline and 20 weeks of stimulation, the rate of reduction in seizure frequency was evaluated, along with quality-of-life using the Short-Form 36-Item Health survey. RESULTS: At baseline, we measured up to 11 and 12 focal seizures per week in Patient 1 and 2, respectively, with both patients achieving seizure freedom after 4 and 20 weeks taVNS, respectively. Patient 1 and 2 were observed for 18 and 14 months, respectively, including the clinical trial and follow-up observation period. Quality-of-life ratings increased in both patients, and no significant adverse events occurred during the study period. During the maintenance period after 20 weeks, seizures remained absent in Patient 1, and seizures remained reduced in Patient 2. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that taVNS may be a promising tool for structural focal epilepsy with preserved cognitive function. A multicenter double-blind clinical trial is needed to confirm the role of taVNS as an anti-seizure tool.

Making Sense of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Stroke.

Implantable vagus nerve stimulation, paired with high-dose occupational therapy, has been shown to be effective in improving upper limb function among patients with stroke and received regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Combining nonsurgical and surgical approaches of vagus nerve stimulation in recent meta-analyses has resulted in misleading reports on the efficacy of each type of stimulation among patients with stroke. This article aims to clarify the confusion surrounding implantable vagus nerve stimulation as a poststroke treatment option, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and implantable vagus nerve stimulation. Recent meta-analyses on vagus nerve stimulation have inappropriately combined studies of fundamentally different interventions, outcome measures, and participant selection, which do not conform to methodological best practices and, hence, cannot be used to deduce the relative efficacy of the different types of vagus nerve stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. Health care providers, patients, and insurers should rely on appropriately designed research to guide well-informed decisions.

No consistent evidence for the anti-inflammatory effect of vagus nerve stimulation in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been identified as an innovative immunosuppressive treatment strategy in rodent studies. However, its' clinical potential is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether VNS can reduce inflammatory proteins and/or immune cells in humans, through a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases Cochrane, Pubmed and World of Knowledge were searched in duplicate up to the 3rd of March 2022 and publications from identified clinical trial registrations were identified until 20th of August 2023. Studies were included if they provided peer-reviewed data for humans who received VNS as short-term (<=1 day) or long-term (>=2 days-365 days) stimulation and reported at least one cytokine or immune cell after treatment.Screening of title, abstract, full text, and data extraction was performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and meta-regression was performed for moderating factors. Reporting bias was assessed. The standardized mean difference (Hedge's g) was used to indicate overall differences of cytokine data (mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range at the study level) to test our a-priori hypothesis. The systematic review of 36 studies with 1135 participants (355 receiving a control/sham condition and 780 receiving VNS) revealed anti-inflammatory effects of VNS for cytokines in several reports, albeit often in subgroup analyses, but our meta-analyses of 26 studies did not confirm these findings. Although most cytokines were numerically reduced, the reduction did not reach statistical significance after VNS: not in the between-group comparisons (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.21, p = 0.359; IL-6: g = -0.94, p = 0.112; long-term: TNF-α: g = -0.13, p = 0.196; IL-6: g = -0.67, p = 0.306); nor in the within-study designs (short-term: TNF-α: g = -0.45, p = 0.630; IL-6: g = 0.28, p = 0.840; TNF-α: g = -0.53, p = 0.297; IL-6:g = -0.02, p = 0.954). Only the subgroup analysis of 4 long-term studies with acute inflammation was significant: VNS decreased CRP significantly more than sham stimulation. Additional subgroup analyses including stimulation duration, stimulation method (invasive/non-invasive), immune stimulation, and study quality did not alter results. However, heterogeneity was high, and most studies had poor to fair quality. Given the low number of studies for each disease, a disease-specific analysis was not possible. In conclusion, while numeric effects were reported in individual studies, the current evidence does not substantiate the claim that VNS impacts inflammatory cytokines in humans. However, it may be beneficial during acute inflammatory events. To assess its full potential, high-quality studies and technological advances are required.

Favorable combinations of antiseizure medication with vagus nerve stimulation to improve health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a non-pharmacological treatment of refractory epilepsy, which also has an antidepressive effect. The favorable combinations of VNS with specific mechanisms of action of antiseizure medication (ASM) on mood and health-related quality of life (HrQol) have not yet been studied. The objective was to identify favourable combinations of specific ASMs with VNS for the HrQoL and depression in refractory epilepsy. METHODS: We performed an observational study including patients with refractory epilepsy and an implanted VNS (N = 151). In the first 24 months after VNS implantation, all patients were on stable ASM therapy. We used the standardized questionnaires QOLIE10, EQVAS and EQ5D to evaluate HrQoL as well as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the synergistic combinations of ASM with VNS for HrQoL. RESULTS: At the year-two follow-up (N = 151, age 45.2 ± 17.0 years), significant improvement (p < 0.05) in BDI scores was found for combination of VNS with SV2A modulators (58.4 %) or AMPA antagonists (44.4 %). A significant increase of HrQoL by at least 30 % (p < 0.05) was measured for a combination of VNS with SV2A modulators (brivaracetam, levetiracetam) or slow sodium channel inhibitors (eslicarbazepine, lacosamide). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggests a favorable effect of the combination of SV2A modulators or slow sodium channel inhibitors with VNS on the HrQoL in comparison to other ASMs. Besides the possible synergistic effects on the seizure frequency, the amelioration of behavioral side effects of SV2A modulators by VNS is an important factor of HrQoL-improvement in these combinations.